📅 Published: 2026-05-11 · 🏢 Samsung / SK Hynix / Micron / SanDisk · 🎯 "Who do you buy in the AI memory supercycle?" 6 to 12 month view
🎯 One-Line Summary
"AI can't get enough memory. All four are flying. Who'll fly highest? Answer: SK Hynix > Samsung > SanDisk > Micron!" 🚀
As of May 2026, all four are up huge in a year. Samsung +420%, SK Hynix +904%, Micron +813%, SanDisk +4,109% (!!). But what matters isn't whether one share looks "expensive" or "cheap"; it's whether market cap divided by revenue (P/S) is fair. By that test, Samsung is the most undervalued and Micron the most expensive.
🏢 What Do They All Do?
One line: all four make "memory chips" for computers, phones, and AI servers. AI demand has driven the biggest boom in their history 🔥
Four-Way Side-by-Side
| Company | Country | Strength | One Line |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Samsung | Korea | Memory, semis, mobile, consumer electronics | "Big brother", does it all but is late on HBM |
| 🇰🇷 SK Hynix | Korea | HBM (AI memory) global #1 | "King of AI memory", safest bet |
| 🇺🇸 Micron | US | DRAM, NAND, HBM | "America's flagship", HBM4 NVIDIA exclusive |
| 🇺🇸 SanDisk | US | NAND (storage memory) only | "Youngest sibling", insane +4,109% in a year |
Most Confusing Point: "Per-share price doesn't matter!"
| Company | Price / Share | Shares | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung | ₩285,500 | 5.97B | ₩1,704T ← biggest |
| SK Hynix | ₩1,908,000 | 0.73B | ₩1,389T |
| Micron | ~₩1,145,500 ($783) | 1.13B | ~₩1,222T |
| SanDisk | ~₩2,322,400 ($1,588) | 0.16B | ₩346T ← smallest |
🤔 Don't get confused: SanDisk's ₩2.32M-per-share equivalent might look like "the most expensive stock," but by market cap it's just one-fifth of Samsung. "Cheap or expensive" should be measured by market cap divided by revenue (P/S).
🚀 What Happened Over the Past Year?
| Company | 1 Year Ago | Now | 1Y Return | Analogy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung | ₩54,900 | ₩285,500 | +420% | ₩10K → ₩52K |
| SK Hynix | ₩190,000 | ₩1,908,000 | +904% | ₩10K → ₩100K |
| Micron | $85 (~₩120K) | $783 (~₩1.15M) | +813% | ₩10K → ₩91K |
| SanDisk | $37 (~₩50K) | $1,588 (~₩2.32M) | +4,109% 😱 | ₩10K → ₩420K!! |
All four exploded, but SanDisk is in another league. 42x in a year is effectively crypto-grade volatility.
🌍 Fundamentals (Record Quarter Across the Board)
Latest Quarter (2026 1Q)
| Item | Samsung | SK Hynix | Micron | SanDisk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quarterly Revenue | ₩133.9T | ₩52.6T | $19B (~₩26T) | $6B (~₩8T) |
| Operating Income | ₩57.2T | ₩37.6T | ~$11B (~₩15T) | n/a |
| Operating Margin | 42.7% (consol.) | 🔥 72% | ~58% | n/a (GM 78%) |
| Revenue YoY | (All-time high) | +198% | ~+90s% | +251% |
🤯 What 72% Operating Margin Actually Means
Analogy: imagine selling $100 of tteokbokki and keeping $72 as profit. Typical manufacturing runs 5 to 15%, even luxury handbags only hit 30 to 40%. SK Hynix at 72% is unprecedented in manufacturing history.
Why is this possible? SK Hynix has a near-monopoly on HBM (AI memory), so NVIDIA and friends pay whatever the asking price is. It's basically mining gold from the AI infrastructure rush.
🆚 The Most Important Concept: "P/S (Market Cap divided by Revenue)"
What is P/S?
Formula: market cap ÷ revenue = "the value the market puts on every $1 of revenue"
Example:
- SK Hynix: ₩1,389T market cap ÷ ₩210T revenue = 6.62x
- Reading: "To buy SK Hynix outright, you'd pay 6.62 years of revenue"
Benchmarks:
| Reference | P/S | Read |
|---|---|---|
| S&P 500 average | ~3x | Fair |
| Normal memory cycle | 3 to 5x | Typical |
| Memory cycle peak | 5 to 6x | Expensive |
| SK Hynix now | 6.62x | Peak-grade but AI premium is justifiable |
| Micron now | 🚨 16.71x | Overheated, possibly a bubble |
Four-Way P/S, the Key Table
| Company | Market Cap | FY26 Revenue | P/S | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung | ₩1,704T | ₩540T (consol.) | 3.16x | Looks cheap (but blended) |
| SK Hynix | ₩1,389T | ₩210T | 6.62x | Fair (AI premium) |
| SanDisk | ₩346T | ₩30T | 11.41x | Expensive |
| Micron | ₩1,222T | ₩73T | 🚨 16.71x | Too expensive |
🤯 Shock point: Micron is 2.5x more expensive than SK Hynix on P/S. Same revenue, but the market pays 2.5x more for Micron's stock.
🍰 SOTP, Samsung Is a Special Case
Samsung's P/S of 3.16x "looks the cheapest" because it blends in mobile, consumer electronics, and display alongside memory. Comparing it as a pure memory company would be wrong.
Analogy: you can't apply the same multiple to a single-menu tteokbokki shop (SK) and a tteokbokki-plus-grocery-store-plus-electronics conglomerate (Samsung). You have to value each business separately and add them up. That method is called SOTP (Sum-of-the-Parts).
Samsung SOTP:
- Memory (DS-Memory): ₩194T × 6.62x = ₩1,287T
- System LSI / Foundry: ₩65T × 7x = ₩454T
- Mobile (MX): ₩151T × 1x = ₩151T
- Consumer (CE / SDC): ₩130T × 0.7x = ₩91T
- Total fair market cap: ₩1,982T → fair price ₩332,080 (+16%)
So simple P/S says +200%, but the real answer is +16 to 30%.
🔑 Key: Samsung's memory unit alone trades at an implied P/S of 5.19x, a -22% discount to SK Hynix at 6.62x. The truly undervalued slice is memory.
🚨 PEG Is a Trap in Memory!
PEG = PER ÷ growth rate. Normally below 1.0 means attractive. All four memory names are at 0.03 to 0.15, which on the surface screams "buy."
| Ticker | PEG |
|---|---|
| Samsung | 0.15 |
| SK Hynix | 0.07 |
| Micron | 0.06 |
| SanDisk | 0.03 |
🚨 It's a trap! Memory is cyclical, so today's +200% growth is one-off. A downcycle that takes EPS down 50% would push PEG from 0.03 to 5.0 overnight. PEG is useful for steady-growth industries like SaaS or healthcare, but basically useless for memory. Don't buy off this number alone.
💰 Where Do Prices Go in 6 to 12 Months?
Averaging revenue growth, P/S normalization, and SOTP models.
Blended Price Targets
| Company | Current | Blended PT | Upside | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 SK Hynix | ₩1,908,000 | ₩2,710,000 | +42% | ★★★★★ Top Pick |
| 🥈 Samsung | ₩285,500 | ₩350,000 | +23% | ★★★★☆ Undervalued |
| 🥉 SanDisk | $1,588 (~₩2.32M) | $2,440 (~₩3.37M) | +54% | ★★★☆☆ Volatile |
| 4th Micron | $783 (~₩1.15M) | $830 (~₩1.15M) | +6% | ★★☆☆☆ Expensive |
🤔 Why is SanDisk only 3rd at +54%?
It's up +4,109% in a year, which makes it dangerously expensive. Fundamentals are strong ($42B backlog, about ₩61T!), but a single quarterly miss can mean -30 to -50%. Volatility bomb, keep the position small.
🤔 Why is Micron the lowest at +6%?
P/S 16.7x is bubble-territory. The AI premium is fully reflected, and mean reversion could mean -20 to -40%. The NVIDIA Vera Rubin exclusive is genuinely positive, but the price has already absorbed it.
💸 ₩1M Invested, What Happens in 1 Year?
Single-name scenarios with no diversification.
| Scenario | Prob | Samsung | SK Hynix | Micron | SanDisk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Bull | 25% | ₩1.45M (+45%) | ₩1.54M (+54%) | ₩1.17M (+17%) | ₩2.30M (+130%) |
| 🟡 Base | 50% | ₩1.23M (+23%) | ₩1.42M (+42%) | ₩1.06M (+6%) | ₩1.54M (+54%) |
| 🔴 Bear | 25% | ₩990K (-1%) | ₩1.21M (+21%) | ₩780K (-22%) | ₩800K (-20%) |
Risk-Adjusted Return
| Company | Expected Value (1Y) | Sharpe-like |
|---|---|---|
| Samsung | ₩1.23M | 3.5 ✨ |
| SK Hynix | ₩1.42M | 3.2 |
| Micron | ₩1.02M | 1.5 |
| SanDisk | ₩1.42M | 1.4 |
Risk-adjusted, SK Hynix and Samsung are safest. SanDisk's expected value is also ₩1.42M, but the range from -20% to +130% is far too wide.
🚦 Traffic Light Summary
| Item | Samsung | SK Hynix | Micron | SanDisk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 🟢 | 🟢🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢🟢 |
| Operating margin | 🟢 | 🟢🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| HBM exposure | 🟡 (late) | 🟢🟢 (#1) | 🟢 (NVIDIA exclusive) | 🔴 (none) |
| Guidance tone | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢🟢 | 🟢🟢 |
| P/S attractiveness | 🟢🟢 (undervalued) | 🟢 | 🔴 (expensive) | 🟡 |
| Volatility (1Y) | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🔴 (+4,109%) |
| Overall | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
🧠 Verdict: How Do You Actually Buy?
🎯 Suggested Weights (100% Memory Allocation Assumed)
Memory Four-Way, Beginner Allocation
- 🥇 SK Hynix
- 40% (Top Pick)
- 🥈 Samsung
- 30% (Undervalued)
- 🥉 SanDisk
- 20% (Volatile, diversify)
- 4th Micron
- 10% (Expensive, small only)
- Country Split
- Korea 70% / US 30%
- Portfolio Cap
- Keep memory under 30% (cycle risk)
- Next Decision Point
- August 2026 earnings cycle
✅ Time-Horizon Guide (Current Cycle Temperature 72°C, Peak Approaching)
★ The right holding period depends on where you are in the cycle. Undervalued zone (0 to 50°C) is the long-term entry window; overvalued zone (70°C+) is short-term trading only; past-peak (85°C+) is sell.
- Short-term trading (1 week to 3 months): 🟢 OK, momentum is strong but apply a strict -10% stop-loss. SK Hynix has the strongest momentum (1Y +904%)
- Medium-term hold (3 to 12 months): 🟡 cautious. Substantive models point to +23 to +42% upside, but cycle peak traversal risk is the offset
- Long-term (1 year+): 🔴 not advised right now. The cleaner long-term entry is the next downcycle (30 to 50°C zone, 1 to 2 years away). Buying here means stomaching -30 to 50% on the downcycle
- Dollar-cost averagers: 🟢 buy only 30% now, save 70% for the downcycle. Cut weight immediately if the cycle score hits 8
Match by Stock and Horizon
- SK Hynix: #1 across all horizons (momentum + fundamentals both strong). For long-term, re-enter after the downcycle
- Samsung: medium-term (waiting for HBM4 NVIDIA qualification trigger). Long-term buyers should stagger in on the downcycle
- SanDisk: short-term only (extreme volatility). Long-term buy zone is a pullback to the $1,300s
- Micron: not recommended short-term (16.7x P/S bubble) or long-term (cycle peak)
❌ Not Suitable For
- Investing with borrowed money: hard no
- Can't stomach -30% drawdowns: memory is cyclical, -50% is always on the table
- Looking for dividends: minimal payouts, high volatility
- Long-term value investors trying to enter at the peak: the Buffett approach only works in the 0 to 50°C zone. At 72°C, long-term buyers must be ready to hold through -30 to 50%
🤓 Cycle Industry: The Most Important Warning
Memory Is a Cyclical Industry
Like real estate, it cycles boom and bust every 2 to 3 years. We're currently near the boom peak.
| Era | State | Memory Four-Way |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 to 2018 | Boom (server cloud) | SK +200% then -60% |
| 2019 to 2020 | Bust | Sideways |
| 2020 to 2021 | Boom (COVID PC) | +150% then -50% |
| 2022 to 2023 | Bust (losses) | -40% |
| 2024 to 2026 (now) | AI supercycle | +400 to 4,100% surge |
| 2027 onwards? | ??? | -30 to -50% on slowdown |
🚦 Cycle Thermometer, Where Are We Now?
Diagnose by counting how many of 10 peak signals are on (each 1 point, score × 10 = temperature).
| # | Signal | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | New cycle-high op margin (SK 72%) | ✅ |
| 2 | All-time P/S highs (6 to 17x) | ✅ |
| 3 | All-time EV/EBITDA (SanDisk 35.7x) | ✅ |
| 4 | HBM sold out (calendar 2026) | ✅ |
| 5 | ASP up 4+ consecutive quarters | ✅ |
| 6 | 1Y price up 300%+ (all four) | ✅ |
| 7 | Revenue YoY +100%+ | ✅ |
| 8 | Hyperscaler capex guide cut | ⬜ |
| 9 | DRAM/NAND spot price stalling/dropping | ⬜ |
| 10 | CXMT/YMTC price offensive | ⬜ |
Current 7/10 = 72°C, "peak approaching, no traversal signal yet" 🌡️
Temperature-Based Action Guide and Expected Price Range
💡 Temperature and price relationship: Temperature is set by how many peak signals are lit, but cycle progression and stock prices typically move together. Below is the expected price range based on SK Hynix (currently ₩1.908M) plus average percent change across all four memory names. Expect ±15% error depending on ticker and timing.
| Temp | State | 4-Stock Avg Change | SK Hynix Est. Price (vs ₩1.908M) | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~30°C | Ice age (loss) | -50~-70% | ~₩600K~950K | 🟢 Buy opportunity (though scary). Buffett would love this zone |
| 30~50°C | Recovery (return to profit) | -30~-50% | ~₩950K~1.35M | 🟢 Buy aggressively. Safest return zone |
| 50~70°C | Boom entering | -10~+10% | ~₩1.70M~2.10M | 🟢 Hold + add |
| 70~85°C | Peak imminent ← Now (72°C) | 0 ~ +30% | ~₩1.90M~2.50M (current + alpha) | 🟡 Start scaling out. Careful with new buys |
| 85~95°C | Past peak | +15 ~ +40% | ~₩2.20M~2.70M (but vulnerable to fast drops) | 🔴 Cut weight quickly |
| 95~100°C | Overheated, collapse near | +30 ~ +50% | ~₩2.50M~2.90M (all-time peak) | 🔴 Sell now. -30~50% possible next quarter |
Reading tips:
- Change rates are "additional move from current (72°C basis) to that temperature", not absolute returns
- Other three: apply same ratios to Samsung ₩285K, Micron $783, SanDisk $1,588
What Should You Do?
- 🟡 Be careful with new buys, chasing risk
- 🟡 If you already own, hold for now, but cut weight if signals 8, 9, or 10 flip
- 🟡 Prep to scale out, stagger selling, not all at once
- 🟢 Re-evaluate after the next earnings cycle (July to August 2026), guidance tone is the key
If the score moves to 8, cut exposure 30 to 50% immediately.
👀 What to Watch Next
| Date | Event | Bull | Bear |
|---|---|---|---|
| Late June | Micron Q3 FY26 | Revenue >$25B | Guidance cut |
| Late July | SK Hynix 2Q | Op margin 75%+ | Op margin <65% |
| Late July | Samsung 2Q | HBM4 NVIDIA qualification | Qualification delay |
| August 13 | SanDisk Q4 FY26 | Revenue $8.5B+ | Revenue <$7.7B |
| Quarterly | NVIDIA capex guide | Upward | Downward |
🤔 Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. If only one, which? SK Hynix. The most stable and the only name where all three models converge in the +40s. AI-era memory #1 status won't waver for the next 2 to 3 years.
Q2. Samsung vs SK Hynix, both Korean, which?
- Short-term, conviction: SK Hynix (HBM #1, already proven)
- Long-term, undervalued: Samsung (rerating if HBM4 NVIDIA qualification clears)
- Suggested split: SK 60 / Samsung 40
Q3. Why is Micron the least attractive despite +813%? Already priced in. Revenue grew, but P/S sits at a bubble-grade 16.7x. For the same revenue growth, you buy SK at 6.62x or Micron at 16.7x. 2.5x worse value than SK.
Q4. SanDisk at +4,109%, too late? Fundamentals are real. NAND supercycle + $42B backlog = strong. But after a +4,109% run, short-term pullback risk is very high. Hold or watch, stagger in if the price retraces to $1,300s.
Q5. How to deploy ₩1M?
SK Hynix: ₩400K → ~0.21 share (need fractional)
Samsung: ₩300K → ~1.05 shares
SanDisk: ₩200K → ~0.09 share
Micron: ₩100K → ~0.09 share
SK and SanDisk are expensive per share, so you need fractional share buying through Toss Securities or similar. With regular orders, ₩1M won't even cover 1 share of SK.
Q6. What if the cycle ends? Historically -30 to -50%. SK Hynix dropped 60% after 2018. Keep memory below 30% of your portfolio. Always hold non-cyclical industries too (healthcare, consumer, SaaS).
Q7. Does buying all four memory names give you Korea/US diversification? The suggested weights (SK 40 / Samsung 30 / SanDisk 20 / Micron 10) naturally land at about 70% Korea / 30% US, which adds a bit of FX diversification. But they all live in the same industry, so country diversification alone does not neutralize cycle risk. If cycle-end signals flip, you still need to cut all four together.
🚨 Risk Warnings
⚠️ Cycle risk, memory swings boom/bust every 2 to 3 years. Next downcycle could mean -30 to -50%. Keep below 30% of portfolio.
⚠️ SanDisk extreme volatility, beta estimated 4 to 5 (4 to 5x the market). A single quarterly miss can mean -30%. ₩1M could lose ₩100K to ₩200K in a single day.
⚠️ Micron bubble risk, P/S 16.7x is the highest grade memory has ever seen. Mean reversion could mean -20 to -40%. No chasing.
⚠️ This report is not investment advice. Decide based on your own judgment and risk tolerance. Never invest with borrowed money.
📚 Glossary
| Term | Plain English |
|---|---|
| Memory | The "remembering chip" in computers and phones. DRAM and NAND are the two types |
| DRAM | Temporary memory that disappears when power is off |
| NAND | Storage memory that persists when power is off |
| HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) | Special memory for AI training, 8 to 12 layers of DRAM stacked. SK Hynix is #1 |
| Market cap | Per-share price × share count. The company's "total value" |
| P/S | Market cap ÷ revenue. Core metric of this report |
| EV/EBITDA | (Market cap + net debt) ÷ pre-D&A profit. More accurate than P/E for memory |
| PEG | P/E ÷ growth rate. A trap for cyclicals (do not trust) |
| SOTP | Sum-of-the-Parts. Necessary for blended businesses like Samsung |
| Op margin | Operating income ÷ revenue. SK Hynix 72% is unprecedented |
| GM | Gross margin. SanDisk 78.4% |
| Capex | Capital expenditures. Micron $25B+ |
| Backlog | Contracted but unrecognized future revenue. SanDisk $42B = 2 years |
| YoY/QoQ/YTD | vs same quarter last year / prior quarter / year-to-date |
📌 One-Sentence Conclusion
"The AI memory supercycle blew up all four names, but per-share price is misleading; market cap divided by revenue (P/S) is the real test of cheap or expensive. SK Hynix 40 + Samsung 30 + SanDisk 20 + Micron 10 is the answer. The cycle thermometer is at 72°C (peak approaching); if the score moves to 8, cut exposure immediately!" 🚀
For data, logic, SOTP, and scenario derivations, see the memory four-way analyst report. For comparison with the standout solo name of the season, see the SanDisk +3,685% beginner guide and SanDisk analyst report, the gap between a NAND pure-play bet and a four-name diversified basket becomes obvious. New to stocks entirely? Start with the stock investing beginner guide.
⚠️ This post is educational reference only; investment decisions are your own responsibility. Talk to a parent or guardian and never invest with borrowed money. Memory is cyclical, so the next downcycle could mean -30 to -50%.